Rainbow Testing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The test of true love
{ 03:51, 4 September 2007 }
{ 0 comments }
{ Link }
What is it about love that so blinds us to faults? It’s a power that makes it possible to adjust to the inconveniences and imperfections of our commitments, but can make us fatally vulnerable to the flaws that truly impede us on our path, that may block us even from every happiness and all the things we truly value. This is no rhetorical question for a tester to consider but a real issue that can block us from our great asset; objectivity. Loss of objectivityThere are numerous circumstances that can lead to a bias that affects planning, testing and reporting. Here are some common examples:
Undoubtedly you could increase this list from your own personal and professional experience but they can be boiled down to two primary drives; a revulsion for something unwanted or a desire for something idealized. Putting it back into perspective – if I could write a sonnet…Don’t be afraid to “count the ways.” If you, your management or your user group are caught up in the hype, write it down. List clearly the benefits that are driving the excitement. Most testers can spot ambiguous language, indefinite pronouns or unclear clauses even in a love letter. Fall back on your talents. Write it out as a list. Then take out that valentine red pen and go to work, doing what you do best, question the language. Any item that cannot be clarified is a risk. Avoiding the reactionary – the enemy of my friend is….Read the criticism, listen to the naysayer’s, make a note of the Chicken Little’s. Once again, rely on your innate skills. Pick up any single article or complaint and make a cuff list of the pertinent points. What are the primary complaints? Time? Money? Support? Stability? These are proposed entries for your risk list. Can you counter them with a mitigation statement? Knock off the truly outrageous and unsupported. Keeping them on the list only serves to belittle the critics, and this state of mind will set you back in objectivity. Remember, you don’t have to respect the messenger, just get the message. If there are valid risks to the project, you’ll be better off if you prepare for them. The enemy of your beloved project may be your friend. Waking up and smelling the coffee – tracking post release issuesWe all make mistakes, but do we learn from them? Make sure to set up a process for collecting and addressing the issues that are uncovered after implementation. Any issues that can be addressed, should be. Issues that are clearly beyond the abilities of the software that you have implemented stand as the requirements for your next significant effort. Don’t forget to track them, you’ll need the reminders for the next time you fall in love. |
About MeMy Profile Archives Friends My Photo Album
LinksSoftware Quality Association of DenverQuality Assurance Institute Worldwide Sticky Minds - online testing magazine Cem Kaner's website Website of company headed by Hung Nguyen CategoriesSoftware TestingBook Review Recent EntriesRegression testing – the Ugly Betty of Testing…Greater is the art of ending Zombie projects – when the software lifecycle won’t die The test of true love The risk retrospective: a hero's eye view Friendsifraserjimhazen strazzerj PeteNairn SyndicationSite Feed |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||